Debates about buying things for Defence to blow people up
with tend to fall into two camps.
There
is the “war is bad so we need to stop funding it, fighting for peace is like
procreating for virginity, all wars are the fault if the West so if we spend
more money on foreign aid we wouldn’t need a defence force because all the nice
people over there wouldn’t come over here and invade” camp.
Then there is the “what the fig are smoking,
international relations works by the law of the jungle, you only own what you
can defend, there were lots of nice Germans in the 1930’s but WWII still
happened, we need lots and lots of shiny new weapons to scare the bad guys
with” camp.
Then there are lots of
people who understand international relations and geo-strategic policy quite
well but lack the technical knowledge to understand practical military things,
such as why the Chinese J-20 stealth fighter/bomber/interceptor is a strategic
game changer that eats the US Joint Strike Fighter for breakfast and has the
Superhornet for desert.
Remember the Somme? Lots of
propaganda, lots of theory, not much empirical
analysis. There are a very small number of people who
actually do real analysis – like Dr John Stillion of Rand Corp (at that time) who
told them the truth about the Joint Strike Fighter – center piece of a defence
ponzi scheme that is now threatening not just Western budgets, but Australia’s
future existence as a nation. The
Australian Defence Force bureaucracy ignored him and every other analyst who
didn’t sing along to the JSF song. The
fact is, if more people had understood what military technology meant for
strategic policy WWII would not have happened.
The fact is, history is repeating.