This blog looks past partisan politics to find solutions and provide insights into public policy. It is the companion blog to the author's on-line training course in democracy and civic action: www.3ptraining.com.au
It covers a wide spectrum of issues from local to international concerns.
It was previously the support blog for the author's biography "Finding Home, An Autobiographical Account of a Child Migrant Growing on the Edge of the Tasmanian Wilderness” available from Amazon.
Erik is a public policy professional and owner of the online training course in democracy and civic action: www.3ptraining.com.au
…explores ways to create a sustainable and just community. Explores how that community can be best protected at all levels including social policy/economics/ military.
Erik’s autobiography is a humorous read about serious things. It concerns living in the bush, wilderness, home education, spirituality, and activism. Finding Home is available from Amazon, Barnes&Noble and all good e-book sellers.
There have been other
inquiries and reports but this one I have read and this one gives a good
historical/cultural background to what Pell is talking about. It is not a
report on the church as such but on institutions of which the Roman Church was
a very important one. It is not light reading. You may need a therapist
In this context there
is one statement and only one statement that Pell or any other high ranking
Catholic could make that has integrity. It goes like this:
victims, families, laity, clergy and the broader community, greeting. On behalf
of the Roman Catholic Church I confess to the following: for at least half a
century our church has enacted an unwritten global policy of protecting
recidivist pedophiles and rapists. In conducting this policy we committed the
following sins systematically and with ‘malice aforethought’:
to accept, investigate or act on accusations against clergy
this become untenable we moved clergy to different parishes, roles, or
times we did this to frustrate investigation by the civil authorities
refused to cooperate meaningfully with the civil authorities
victims went to the civil authorities we bought their silence with miserly sums
of money and bound them with non-disclosure clauses
thus took advantage of our relative wealth and power to use the legal system to
bully our victims
continued to allow offending clergy unsupervised access to children and in some
institutional settings allowed them effective ownership of children
then denied to various Parliaments, the press, our own congregations, and the
broader community, that there was a problem
legal and moral crimes which, according to our theology are worthy of eternal
damnation and torment in hell. For these we apologise and for these we ask
forgiveness. As an act of repentance we
have decided to sell some of the treasures in the Vatican museum to fund a
multimillion dollar international fund to compensate and assist victims. We do
so voluntarily and without coercion.
We instruct all members of our church who
learn of any offending to immediately contact the civil authorities. We will
make our records available to the civil authorities. Confessions heard in
relation to child abuse are no longer sacrosanct and must be reported to the
civil authorities. Failure to do so on the part of clergy will cause them to be
defrocked. Since it is almost certain that some of highest ranking members of
our organisation are recidivist criminals we acknowledge that we are fallible
and need external help. To that end we will seek secular and external review of
our recruitment and training processes that have allowed perhaps five to ten
percent of our priests to have unnatural attractions.
apologise to the great majority of our clergy whose reputations are now tarnished
by association with our organisation. You have kept your vows and faithfully
served your community. We ask your help in rehabilitating our church and our
But it can be done. The
Anglican Church in Tasmania is not a wealthy or powerful organisation but
squarely addressed the issue of abuse under the leadership of then Bishop John
Harrower. The Bishop met with victims,
told them he believed them, and set about reviewing the church’s internal
processes including mandatory safety training for anyone working with children.
The church is short of cash but had an old historic mansion traditionally the
home of the Tasmanian Bishop. This was voluntarily sold and the proceeds used
as a fund to assist victims. In many ways this set the benchmark for any
organisation whose paid staff have abused children. So why can’t the Roman
Church do it?
The answer is because, in
their attitude to sex and authority, the laity (those are the people in the
pews) are Christians but the clergy (the ones with the frocks) are gnostics.
Let me explain.
Christianity is a first
century Jewish sect. The first question Jesus’ remaining disciples had to
answer was whether it was open to non-Jews. The Jewish attitude to sex at the time
was pretty simple – marry young, do it a lot, have many children. The Roman
Church has continued with this attitude for its lay membership.
In the first century church
only married people with children were allowed positions of leadership. The
notion of a celibate priesthood is an inversion of scripture on many levels.
Gnosticism emerged as an early heresy. It taught that the physical, earthly,
corporeal realm was evil and the soul’s task was to escape from it (Buddhism
anyone?) Sex and sexuality was something that tied the soul to this realm. For
that reason those seeking true Godliness should be celibate. The gnostics
claimed esoteric knowledge which could only be obtained by initiation from an emerging
class of people who claimed enlightenment and who were thus closer to Divinity.
Gnosticism became a popular and highly organized religion known as Catharism
that rivaled the Roman Church. This was not to be tolerated and after the
inquisition perhaps a quarter of a million Cathars were dead or had converted.
Catharism ceased to exist but was in effect adopted by the Roman Hierarchy. The
flesh was sinful. The celibate clergy were the ones close to Divinity by
process of initiation. They and only they could dispense grace to the sinful
laity. Later this hierarchy claimed actual infallibility. Technically this only
applies to the Pope in matters of doctrine, but culturally the higher echelons
of the church consider themselves to be above the sinful secular world. As the
great incorporator of many traditions the Roman Church now has the Jewish attitude
to sex for its laity and the gnostic attitude for its clergy. As regards their
attitude to sex and Divinity they are Cathars not Christians.
…and that is why Pell can’t
apologise. Because if his class are fallible, if they are not the enlightened
ones who are closer to Divinity than everyone else, then the Vatican has no
reason to exist in its current form. The house of cards crumbles. The Pope is
not the “Vicar of Christ” being God’s ultimate representative on earth. The
Roman Church is not the ‘corpus Christi” or body of Christ. The Vatican can
make no legitimate claim to be a sovereign State. In fact, the Roman Church
would have to become a normal church like every other Christian denomination. It
would still be hierarchical but no longer infallible. It could then direct its
energies outwards to do good, rather than inwards to maintaining position. It could
complete the good work begun with Vatican II.
This would undoubtedly be
a positive outcome for the Church and for the broader community. And this is
precisely the outcome that Pell, those who promoted him, and those who elected
the current and former Pope, have spent their professional lives working to
prevent. It is not that Pell doesn’t care about abuse…but he is not going to
let the house of cards fall. After all this has been a 600 year campaign.
For a further historic
perspective consider John Wycliffe. Wycliffe was the first person to translate
the Bible into English and give it to the people (those that could read
anyway). The Roman Church was concerned that if people could read the Bible for
themselves things might get out of hand and so they burned Wycliffe’s followers
alive. They were right to be concerned. Once word got out that the medieval
feudal system was not in-fact ordained by God the peasants rose up in the world’s
first documented violent socialist revolution in 1382. It is known today as the
‘Peasant’s Revolt’. The revolution was betrayed but Wycliffe was too well
connected to be killed and died of natural causes. The Pope meanwhile condemned
his as a heretic (Wycliffe had become anti-clerical). Since a heretic could not
rest on sacred soil Wycliffe’s body was exhumed, burned, and the ashes thrown
into the local river in 1415. It’s been 600 years now and no one is apologising.
The Vatican will always
and by whatever means necessary defend its claim to absolute power. Pell has
this historical perspective…and that’s why he will express regret, and perhaps
feel it, but the fictional apology given above will never happen; not unless a pope
decides to break with 600 years of tradition. If they did, and if they were not
assassinated, people like Pell would devote their lives to reversing such a